FORT WAYNE COMMERCIAL GLASS REPAIR RESEARCH
Safety Glazing Requirements Chart: IBC and IRC Compared
Published and last fully verified: · Dataset version: 2026-07-25-v1
This safety glazing requirements chart maps all seven hazardous locations defined by the 2024 IBC and 2024 IRC, side by side, with the dimension that triggers each one. The headline finding is a 24-inch split: for glazing beside stairways and at the bottom stair landing, the 2024 IRC uses a 36-inch vertical trigger while the 2024 IBC uses 60 inches. The section numbers also moved on the residential side: the 2024 IRC renumbered the glazing provisions from R308 to R324.
Scope: The 2024 IRC and 2024 IBC columns are national model-code references. The Indiana section separately identifies the older editions currently published for use in Indiana and Allen County. An adopted code, incorporated amendments, approved project documents, product listings, and the authority having jurisdiction control a specific project.
KEY CODE NUMBERS
What are the key safety glazing code numbers?
These are the page’s fastest quotable findings. Each carries the controlling figure, edition or date, qualifier, named primary source, and the July 25, 2026 verification date.
- In the 2024 model codes, glazing beside stairways and at bottom stair landings uses a 36-inch vertical trigger in the IRC and a 60-inch trigger in the IBC—a 24-inch difference. Source: ICC 2024 IRC §§R324.4.6–R324.4.7 and ICC 2024 IBC §§2406.4.6–2406.4.7; verified July 25, 2026.
- The 2024 IBC and 2024 IRC each organize the core human-impact safety-glazing rules into seven hazardous-location subsections. Source: ICC 2024 IBC §§2406.4.1–2406.4.7 and ICC 2024 IRC §§R324.4.1–R324.4.7; verified July 25, 2026.
- Door-adjacent glazing generally requires a bottom exposed edge below 60 inches plus a 24-inch proximity test, but the IBC and IRC define that 24-inch zone differently. Source: ICC 2024 IBC §2406.4.2 and ICC 2024 IRC §R324.4.2; verified July 25, 2026.
- A large, low window meets the general hazardous-location test only when all four conditions are true: pane area greater than 9 square feet, bottom edge below 18 inches, top edge above 36 inches, and a walking surface within 36 inches. Source: ICC 2024 IBC §2406.4.3 and ICC 2024 IRC §R324.4.3; verified July 25, 2026.
- Where the model codes require human-impact testing, glazing defaults to CPSC Category II unless the applicable code table indicates otherwise; the ANSI alternative likewise defaults to Class A where permitted. Source: ICC 2024 IBC §2406.2 and ICC 2024 IRC §R324.3.1; verified July 25, 2026.
- CPSC Category I/Class B uses a 150 foot-pound impact test with a 100-pound shot bag dropped 18 to 18.5 inches; Category II/Class A uses 400 foot-pounds and a 48- to 48.5-inch drop. Source: U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission final rule and 16 CFR Part 1201; verified July 25, 2026.
- The federal regulation itself equates Category I with Class B and Category II with Class A. Source: 16 CFR §1201.2(a)(3)–(4); Title 16 current through July 23, 2026; verified July 25, 2026.
- Current 16 CFR Part 1201 names five covered architectural product types: storm or combination doors, doors, bathtub doors and enclosures, shower doors and enclosures, and sliding patio-type glass doors. Source: 16 CFR §1201.1(a); Title 16 current through July 23, 2026; verified July 25, 2026.
- Since 1981, the CPSC has expressly excluded an exterior-wall window over a bathtub or within a shower stall from that federal enclosure interpretation, while an adopted building code can still classify the same location as hazardous. Source: 16 CFR §1201.40, 46 FR 45751; verified July 25, 2026.
- The 2024 IBC uses an 8-foot outboard-pane exception for the large-window rule, while the 2024 IRC retains a 25-foot exception. Source: ICC 2024 IBC §2406.4.3 and ICC 2024 IRC §R324.4.3; verified July 25, 2026.
- The 2024 IBC states that where safety glazing is required, the requirement applies to single glazing, laminated glass, and every pane in a multipane assembly. Source: ICC 2024 IBC §2406.1; verified July 25, 2026.
- The 2024 IBC glass-guard provisions set maximum nominal stresses of 3,000 psi for heat-strengthened glass and 6,000 psi for fully tempered glass under the specified design method. Source: ICC 2024 IBC §2407.1.1; verified July 25, 2026.
- Indiana currently lists a 2012 IBC base for commercial buildings and a 2018 IRC base for one- and two-family dwellings—a six-year edition spread inside one state. Source: Indiana Fire Prevention and Building Safety Commission rules table, 675 IAC 13-2.6 and 675 IAC 14-4.4; verified July 25, 2026.
- Under Indiana's 2012 IBC base, the commercial bottom-stair-landing trigger remains below 36 inches above the landingand within 60 inches horizontally of the bottom tread, not the current IBC's below-60-inch arc test. Source: ICC 2012 IBC §2406.4.7 and Indiana's adopted-code record; verified July 25, 2026.
- ANSI Z97.1-2026 is now available, while current 16 CFR Part 1201 continues to incorporate ANSI Z97.1-2015 and the 2024 IRC references ANSI Z97.1-2015 (R2020). Source: ASC Z97, 16 CFR §1201.4, and ICC 2024 IRC Chapter 44; verified July 25, 2026.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
What does this page contain?
Each link below leads directly to the relevant chart, table, or section. Every major table and key finding has a stable anchor so it can be referenced directly.
THE CHART
What does the safety glazing requirements chart show?
Both 2024 model codes identify seven core hazardous locations where human-impact safety-glazing rules apply. Five categories share the same broad trigger, while the stairway and bottom-landing rows use different vertical dimensions and several other rows contain code-specific geometry or exceptions.
Table 1. Safety glazing hazardous locations: 2024 IBC and 2024 IRC compared
| # | Hazardous location | 2024 IBC section | 2024 IRC section | What triggers it | Key exceptions and distinctions | Tier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Glazing in doors | 2406.4.1 | R324.4.1 | Fixed or operable glazing in swinging, sliding, or bifold doors | Both: decorative glazing and openings through which a 3-inch-diameter sphere cannot pass. IBC also: curved glazed panels in revolving doors and commercial refrigerated cabinet glazed doors | ★ |
| 2 | Glazing adjacent to doors | 2406.4.2 | R324.4.2 | Bottom exposed edge below 60 inches, plus the code's 24-inch proximity test | Both: decorative glazing, intervening permanent barrier, closet/storage area 3 feet or less deep. IRC also: glazing adjacent to the fixed panel of a patio door. IBC also: a limited latch-side perpendicular-wall exception in one- and two-family dwellings and Group R-2 dwelling units | ★ |
| 3 | Glazing in windows | 2406.4.3 | R324.4.3 | All four: pane area greater than 9 sq ft; bottom edge below 18 inches; top edge above 36 inches; walking surface within 36 inches horizontally | Decorative glazing; qualifying rail 34–38 inches high, rated for 50 lb/linear ft without contacting the glass; edition-specific outboard-pane exception—8 feet in the 2024 IBC, 25 feet in the 2024 IRC | ★ |
| 4 | Glazing in guards and railings | 2406.4.4 | R324.4.4 | Structural baluster panels and nonstructural infill panels, regardless of pane area or height above a walking surface | No area or height exception in the hazardous-location rule; separate structural guard requirements can also apply | ★ |
| 5 | Glazing at wet surfaces | 2406.4.5 | R324.4.5 | Glazing in specified walls, enclosures, or fences where the bottom exposed edge is below 60 inches above a standing or walking surface | IRC and IBC use different relationship language and do not state the horizontal-distance exception identically; see the detailed section below | ★ |
| 6 | Glazing adjacent to stairways, intermediate landings, and ramps | 2406.4.6 — below 60 inches | R324.4.6 — below 36 inches | Measured above the plane of the adjacent walking surface | IRC: qualifying horizontal protective rail or glazing at least 36 inches away horizontally. IBC: code-compliant guard with the glass plane more than 18 inches from the railing, or glazing at least 36 inches away horizontally | ★ |
| 7 | Glazing adjacent to the bottom stair landing | 2406.4.7 — below 60 inches above the landing | R324.4.7 — below 36 inches above the landing | Within a 60-inch horizontal arc less than 180 degrees from the bottom tread nosing | Glazing protected by a qualifying guard where the plane of the glass is more than 18 inches from the guard | ★ |
★ = row read directly against an official code, regulation, issuing-agency publication, or official edition-change record. Primary sources: ICC 2024 IBC Chapter 24; ICC 2024 IRC Chapter 3; Humboldt County R324.4 cross-check. All checked July 25, 2026.
1. Glazing in doors
Every fixed or operable glazed panel in a swinging, sliding, or bifold door is a hazardous location under the cited model-code sections. Pane area and mounting height do not create a general exemption, but the small-opening and decorative-glazing exceptions still matter.
Neither code applies the rule where a 3-inch-diameter sphere cannot pass through the glazed opening or where the glazing is decorative. The IBC carries two additional exceptions: curved glazed panels in revolving doors and glazed doors on commercial refrigerated cabinets. That commercial-cabinet exception is why a refrigerated display door should not be treated as though it were an ordinary passage door.
The federal category is a separate question. Under 16 CFR §1201.2, a covered door or storm/combination door with no individual lite greater than 9 square feet falls in Category I/Class B; any individual lite greater than 9 square feet places that covered product in Category II/Class A.
2. Glazing adjacent to doors
This is the rule that reaches many sidelites and wall panels flanking an entrance. Both codes require the bottom exposed edge to sit below 60 inches above the walking surface, but they draw the 24-inch zone differently.
The IBC asks whether the nearest vertical edge of the glazing lies within a 24-inch arc of either vertical edge of the closed door. The IRC uses two routes: glazing within 24 inches of either side of the closed door in the same plane, or glazing on a wall less than 180 degrees from the plane of the closed doorand within 24 inches of the hinge side of an in-swinging door. Reducing the IRC provision to “perpendicular to the door” changes the rule and is inaccurate.
Both codes exempt decorative glazing, glazing separated by an intervening wall or permanent barrier, and glazing at access to a closet or storage area 3 feet or less deep. The IRC also exempts glazing adjacent to the fixed panel of a patio door. The IBC instead includes a limited exception for glazing on the latch side of and perpendicular to the closed-door plane in one- and two-family dwellings and within Group R-2 dwelling units.
3. Glazing in windows
A large window low to the floor is a hazardous location under this rule only when all four conditions are met simultaneously:
- Exposed area of the individual pane greater than 9 square feet
- Bottom edge less than 18 inches above the floor or adjacent walking surface
- Top edge greater than 36 inches above the floor or adjacent walking surface
- One or more walking surfaces within 36 inches, measured horizontally from the plane of the glazing
The comparison operators are part of the rule. A pane measuring exactly 9 square feet does not satisfy “greater than 9.” A bottom edge exactly 18 inches above the floor does not satisfy “less than 18,” and a top edge exactly 36 inches high does not satisfy “greater than 36.”
The outboard-pane exception now differs by code: the 2024 IBC uses 8 feet above adjacent exterior grade or a walking surface; the 2024 IRC retains 25 feet and also names a roof or qualifying horizontal or sloped surface.
4. Glazing in guards and railings
Glazing in guards and railings, including structural baluster panels and nonstructural infill panels, is a hazardous location regardless of pane area or height above a walking surface. The hazardous-location classification answers the human-impact question; it does not complete the structural design analysis.
Structural glass guards are addressed separately. In the 2024 IBC, §2407 includes material, support, load, and design provisions, including maximum nominal stress values of 3,000 psi for heat-strengthened glass and 6,000 psi for fully tempered glass. Compliance with §2406 alone does not establish compliance with §2407.
5. Glazing at wet surfaces
The 2024 IRC treats glazing in walls, enclosures, or fences containing or adjacent to listed wet features as hazardous when the bottom exposed edge is below 60 inches. The 2024 IBC uses containing or facing and the same below-60-inch condition.
The horizontal exception is not identical. The 2024 IRC excepts glazing more than 60 inches horizontally from the water's edge or from the edge of a shower, sauna, or steam room. The 2024 IBC's exception covers glazing more than 60 inches horizontally from the water's edge of a bathtub, hot tub, spa, whirlpool, or swimming pool; it should not be expanded to showers, saunas, or steam rooms by paraphrase.
6. Glazing adjacent to stairways, intermediate landings, and ramps
This is where the two current model codes part company. Under the 2024 IBC, glazing is hazardous where its bottom exposed edge is below 60 inches above the adjacent walking surface. Under the 2024 IRC, the same vertical trigger is 36 inches.
The exceptions also differ. The IRC permits a qualifying horizontal protective rail on the accessible side, or glazing at least 36 inches horizontally from the walking surface. The IBC permits a code-compliant guard where the plane of the glass is more than 18 inches from the railing, or glazing at least 36 inches horizontally.
7. Glazing adjacent to the bottom stair landing
The same 36-versus-60 split appears at the bottom stair landing. The 2024 IRC reaches glazing below 36 inches above the landing and within a 60-inch horizontal arc less than 180 degrees from the bottom tread nosing. The 2024 IBC uses the same current arc concept but a vertical trigger below 60 inches.
Both current model codes include a guard-based exception where the glazing is protected by a qualifying guard and the plane of the glass is more than 18 inches from the guard.
The edition history matters in Indiana. The official 2012 IBC text uses a below-36-inch vertical trigger and a location within 60 inches horizontally of the bottom tread. The transition to 60 inches occurred in the 2015 IBC. Indiana's current commercial code remains based on the 2012 IBC.
IRC vs IBC
Where do the IRC and IBC actually disagree?
The two codes share the same seven broad hazardous-location categories, but they are not interchangeable. The material differences include section numbering, door geometry and exceptions, the outboard-pane threshold, wet-surface language, stair protection, and the two 24-inch vertical divergences near stairs.
Table 2. Material 2024 IRC–IBC differences in safety glazing rules
| Point of comparison | 2024 IRC | 2024 IBC | Consequence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current section numbers | R324.4.1–R324.4.7 | 2406.4.1–2406.4.7 | A section number without its code and edition is incomplete |
| Door exceptions | 3-inch-sphere opening; decorative glazing | Those two, plus revolving-door curved panels and commercial refrigerated cabinet glazed doors | Commercial door-product exceptions are broader in the IBC |
| Door-adjacent geometry | Same-plane 24-inch zone, or wall less than 180° from the closed-door plane within 24 inches of the hinge side of an in-swinging door | Nearest vertical glazing edge within a 24-inch arc of either closed-door vertical edge | The shapes are different and can produce different answers |
| Additional door-adjacent exception | Glazing adjacent to the fixed panel of a patio door | Latch-side perpendicular-wall exception in one- and two-family dwellings and Group R-2 dwelling units | Each code contains an exception the other does not state the same way |
| Outboard pane at large, low windows | 25 feet or more above the named exterior surfaces | 8 feet or more above adjacent exterior grade or a walking surface | The 2024 model codes now use materially different heights and surface language |
| Wet-area relationship language | "Containing or adjacent to" | "Containing or facing" | Do not substitute one code's relationship test for the other |
| Wet-area horizontal exception | More than 60 inches from the water's edge or the edge of a shower, sauna, or steam room | More than 60 inches from the water's edge of a bathtub, hot tub, spa, whirlpool, or swimming pool | The IRC exception reaches named dry-edge features that the IBC exception does not list |
| Stairways, intermediate landings, and ramps | Bottom edge below 36 inches; protective-rail or 36-inch-horizontal exception | Bottom edge below 60 inches; guard-and-18-inch-distance or 36-inch-horizontal exception | Different vertical trigger and different protection language |
| Bottom stair landing | Below 36 inches above landing | Below 60 inches above landing | 24-inch vertical divergence |
Primary sources: ICC 2024 IRC Chapter 3 and ICC 2024 IBC Chapter 24. Checked July 25, 2026.
Why do some sources say R308.4 and others say R324.4?
The 2024 IRC reorganized Chapter 3 and moved the glazing provisions from R308 to R324. The official 2018 IRC-based Indiana code uses R308.4, while the official 2024 IRC publishes the current model-code provisions at R324.4.
Both numbers can be correct for different editions. A citation to “IRC R308.4” or “IRC R324.4” without the edition year is incomplete. Because Indiana currently uses an amended 2018 IRC base, R308.4 remains the residential citation in Indiana while R324.4 is the 2024 model-code reference.
IMPACT CLASS
What impact class does the glass actually have to meet?
A hazardous-location finding establishes that human-impact safety glazing is required; it does not by itself identify every permitted product or table exception. The model codes generally default to CPSC Category II, with Category I available only where the governing table permits it.
Table 3. CPSC impact categories and ANSI class equivalents
| Classification | Impact energy | Drop height | Impactor |
|---|---|---|---|
| CPSC Category I = ANSI Class B | 150 foot-pounds | 18 to 18.5 inches | 100-pound shot bag |
| CPSC Category II = ANSI Class A | 400 foot-pounds | 48 to 48.5 inches | 100-pound shot bag |
Primary sources: 16 CFR Part 1201 and the CPSC 2016 final rule incorporating ANSI Z97.1-2015 test procedures. Title 16 current through July 23, 2026; checked July 25, 2026.
The equivalence is not merely an industry crosswalk. The current federal definitions are titled “Category I products (Class B)” and “Category II products (Class A)” in 16 CFR §1201.2(a)(3)–(4).
Table 4. Which federal category applies to which covered product?
| Architectural product | Federal category | Size condition |
|---|---|---|
| Storm or combination door | Category I / Class B | No individual glazing piece greater than 9 square feet |
| Door | Category I / Class B | No individual glazing piece greater than 9 square feet |
| Storm or combination door | Category II / Class A | Any individual glazing piece greater than 9 square feet |
| Door | Category II / Class A | Any individual glazing piece greater than 9 square feet |
| Shower door or enclosure | Category II / Class A | No separate lite-size threshold in the category definition |
| Bathtub door or enclosure | Category II / Class A | No separate lite-size threshold in the category definition |
| Sliding glass door, patio type | Category II / Class A | No separate lite-size threshold in the category definition |
Primary source: 16 CFR §1201.2(a)(3)–(4), eCFR; read July 25, 2026.
FEDERAL SCOPE
Does the federal rule cover ordinary windows?
No—not as a separate covered product category in the current scope of 16 CFR Part 1201. The federal rule names five architectural product types, while ordinary windows, guards, stair glazing, and many wet-area wall panels become safety-glazing locations through an adopted building code instead.
Table 5. Federal product scope versus building-code location scope
| Product or location | Covered by current 16 CFR Part 1201? | Can the adopted code classify it as hazardous? |
|---|---|---|
| Storm doors and combination doors | Yes | Yes, under the door rule, subject to its exceptions |
| Doors, interior or exterior | Yes | Yes, under the door rule, subject to its exceptions |
| Bathtub doors and enclosures | Yes | Yes, when the wet-surface location conditions apply |
| Shower doors and enclosures | Yes | Yes, when the wet-surface location conditions apply |
| §1201.1(a)(5) [Reserved] | — | — |
| Sliding glass doors, patio type | Yes | Yes, under the door rule, subject to its exceptions |
| Ordinary windows and wall panels | No separate current product category | Yes, when §2406.4.3 or §R324.4.3 is triggered, or another hazardous-location rule applies |
| Guards, railings, and baluster panels | No separate current product category | Yes, under §2406.4.4 or §R324.4.4 |
| Stairway, ramp, and bottom-landing glazing | No separate current product category | Yes, under §§2406.4.6–2406.4.7 or §§R324.4.6–R324.4.7 |
| Exterior-wall window over a bathtub or within a shower stall | No—expressly excluded from the federal enclosure interpretation | Yes, when the adopted wet-surface conditions are met |
Primary sources: 16 CFR §§1201.1, 1201.2, 1201.3, and 1201.40; ICC 2024 IBC §2406.4 and 2024 IRC §R324.4. Read July 25, 2026.
The exterior-wall bathroom window
After the federal standard took effect, the CPSC received questions about whether an exterior-wall window over a bathtub or within a shower stall counted as a bathtub or shower enclosure. In 1981 the Commission issued the interpretation now codified at 16 CFR §1201.40, stating that Part 1201 does not apply to glazing in those exterior-wall windows.
The interpretation is narrow. It resolves the federal enclosure definitions; it does not displace an adopted building code's wet-surface rule. A federal exclusion and a building-code hazardous-location requirement can therefore coexist for the same window.
EDITION CHANGES
What changed between code editions?
Every section number and threshold on this page belongs to an edition. The changes below are the ones that materially alter a citation, a measurement, or the relationship between the current model codes and the editions still used in Indiana.
Table 6. Verified safety glazing changes by code edition
| Edition or transition | What changed | Tier |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 IBC | By the 2012 edition, §2406.4 was organized into subsections .1 through .7, including a bottom-landing rule at §2406.4.7 | ★ |
| 2012 → 2015 IBC | §2406.4.7 changed from glazing below 36 inches above the landing and within 60 inches horizontally of the bottom tread to a below-60-inch condition with the current arc-and-nosing geometry | ★ |
| 2015 IRC | Added a figure for the bottom-landing hazard area and clarified the area beyond the plane of the bottom tread nosing | ★ |
| 2018 IRC | Replaced and relabeled the bottom-landing figure to identify the illustrated area as hazardous rather than universally prohibited | ★ |
| 2024 IBC §2406.1 | States expressly that where safety glazing is required, the requirement applies to single glazing, laminated glass, and every pane in a multipane assembly | ★ |
| 2024 IBC §2406.4.3 | Uses floor or adjacent walking surface in the edge conditions and changes the outboard-pane exception from 25 feet to 8 feet above adjacent exterior grade or a walking surface | ★ |
| 2024 IBC §2407.1.1 | Uses explicit maximum nominal stress limits of 3,000 psi for heat-strengthened glass and 6,000 psi for fully tempered glass under the specified design method | ★ |
| 2024 IRC | Renumbers the glazing provisions from R308 to R324 while retaining the 25-foot outboard-pane exception in R324.4.3 | ★ |
| ANSI Z97.1-2015 | Eliminates the former Class C impact category; Class A and Class B remain the safety-glazing impact classes, while the federal rule retains a narrow exemption for fire-resistant wired glass when all conditions in §1201.1(c)(1) are met | ★ |
| ANSI Z97.1-2026 | The new edition is available from ASC Z97 and succeeds ANSI Z97.1-2015 (R2020); ASC Z97 states that the CPSC continues to reference the 2015 edition because the test method was not revised | ★ |
Primary sources: ICC 2012 IBC, 2015 IBC, and 2024 IBC; ICC 2015 IBC Update; 2016 CPSC final rule; ASC Z97 2026 foreword. Checked July 25, 2026.
Why does the 8-foot outboard-pane change matter?
The 2021 IBC and Indiana's 2012 IBC base use a 25-foot exception for the outboard pane of qualifying multiple glazing. The 2024 IBC reduces that height to 8 feet and removes the former references to a roof and other horizontal or sloped surfaces, while the 2024 IRC retains the 25-foot formulation.
That is now a true IRC–IBC divergence, not an unresolved question. A current-model-code chart that prints one outboard threshold without naming the code is incomplete.
When did the IBC bottom-landing trigger change?
The transition occurred in the 2015 IBC. The official 2012 IBC text shows the below-36-inch rule; the official 2015 IBC text shows the below-60-inch rule; and ICC's 2015 IBC update identifies the revised height criterion and clarified horizontal measurement.
SCOPE
What does this chart show, and what does it leave out?
This chart compares current model-code hazardous-location rules, federal product classifications, and the editions currently published for Indiana and Allen County. It does not declare what is legally required on a particular project, because enforceability depends on adoption, amendments, project scope, approvals, and the authority having jurisdiction.
A model code is a reference until a jurisdiction adopts it. The Indiana layer demonstrates why the distinction matters: Indiana's commercial edition remains based on the 2012 IBC, so at least one material threshold differs from the 2024 IBC column.
METHODOLOGY
How was this dataset built?
Fort Wayne Commercial Glass Repair Research assembled the chart from primary code, regulation, standards-developer, state-agency, and county material read on . The dataset was normalized into 12 records, with the original comparison operators, code editions, section numbers, exceptions, source URLs, and verification date retained in each record.
- What we collected. For each of the seven hazardous locations, we recorded the section number, triggering condition, dimensional threshold, comparison operator, and named exceptions separately for the 2024 IBC and 2024 IRC. We then recorded the federal product scope, Category I/II assignments, impact energies, drop heights, edition changes, and Indiana's adopted editions.
- Where we got it. The current model-code columns use ICC Digital Codes for the 2024 IBC and 2024 IRC. Humboldt County's government-published R324.4 page was used as a readable official cross-check. The 2012 and 2015 IBC pages and ICC's 2015 update establish the bottom-landing transition. The federal layer uses 16 CFR Part 1201 on eCFR and the CPSC's final rule. The Indiana layer uses the Indiana Department of Homeland Security's code table, the Indiana Register's final rule, the incorporated 2020 Indiana Residential Code, Indiana's General Administrative Rules, and Allen County's current-code page.
- How we processed it. Measurements were normalized to inches, feet, square feet, foot-pounds, and pounds per square inch while preserving the source's comparison operators. “Greater than,” “less than,” “within,” “more than,” and “or more” were not converted into approximate ranges.
- How we handled editions. A section number is stored with its code and edition. The current national comparison uses 2024 model codes. Indiana's commercial column uses the 2012 IBC base identified in 675 IAC 13-2.6, and its residential column uses the 2018 IRC base identified in 675 IAC 14-4.4.
- How we handled conflicts. The issuing agency or official code text controls over a national status database, secondary summary, or trade article. Where different editions contain different rules, the dataset keeps both values visible rather than smoothing them into a single number.
- Copyright. The IBC and IRC are copyrighted by the International Code Council. The page summarizes the requirements in original language, identifies the controlling sections, and does not reproduce an entire code section or table.
- Verification tier. Every published record is marked ★, meaning it was read directly against an official code, regulation, issuing-agency page, standards-developer publication, or official edition-change record. No consequential value remains in a pending tier.
- What we did not use as evidence. Contractor pages, code forums, home-inspection articles, and other competitor content were used only to identify common wording and points of confusion. No requirement or number in the published dataset is sourced from them.
INDIANA · ALLEN COUNTY
Which code edition applies in Indiana and Allen County?
The newest model code is not the code currently published for use in Indiana. Indiana identifies a 2012 IBC-based commercial code and a 2018 IRC-based residential code as currently in effect, and Allen County publishes the same bases on its current-code page.
Table 7. Indiana and Allen County adopted codes and review path
| Item | Verified detail | Tier |
|---|---|---|
| Commercial code | 2014 Indiana Building Code, 675 IAC 13-2.6, adopting the 2012 International Building Code, first printing, with Indiana amendments; effective December 1, 2014; listed as currently in effect | ★ |
| Residential code | 2020 Indiana Residential Code, 675 IAC 14-4.4, adopting the 2018 International Residential Code, first printing, with Indiana amendments; effective December 26, 2019; listed as currently in effect | ★ |
| Accessibility standard identified with the commercial code | ANSI A117.1, 2009 edition, first printing | ★ |
| Chapter 24 amendment | 675 IAC 13-2.6-25 amends IBC §2403.1 identification: the manufacturer's label requirement can be satisfied where approved and an affidavit from the glazing contractor certifies compliant glazing; safety glazing identification continues to point to §2406.3. The adopted Chapter 24 amendment does not create a separate §2406 hazardous-location amendment | ★ |
| Allen County plan review | Allen County states that it does not perform plan review; plan reviews are performed at state level, and the construction design release number is supplied at permit submission | ★ |
| Class 1 design release | 675 IAC 12-6-3 states that construction on a Class 1 structure may not proceed until a design release is issued unless the work is exempt under the following section | ★ |
| Allen County Building Department address | 200 East Berry Street, Suite 180, Fort Wayne, Indiana 46802 | ★ |
Primary sources: Indiana Fire Prevention and Building Safety Commission rules table; Indiana Register final rule 675 IAC 13-2.6; Indiana General Administrative Rules; Allen County Permits & Planning. Checked July 25, 2026.
What does the 2012 IBC base change in Indiana?
The bottom-stair-landing row reads differently. Under the 2012 IBC text incorporated as Indiana's commercial base, glazing is hazardous where it is below 36 inches above the landing and within 60 inches horizontally of the bottom tread. The 2024 IBC uses below 60 inches and a 60-inch arc less than 180 degrees from the bottom tread nosing.
A chart built only against the 2021 or 2024 IBC therefore states a commercial vertical trigger 24 inches higher than Indiana's base edition and uses different horizontal geometry. The current-model-code column remains useful, but it cannot be labeled as Indiana law.
Which residential section numbers apply in Indiana?
Because Indiana's residential code is based on the 2018 IRC, the relevant residential hazardous-location citations remain R308.4.1 through R308.4.7. The 2024 IRC's R324 numbering is a national model-code reference, not the current Indiana section number.
How does plan review work in Allen County?
Allen County's Building Department states that it does not perform plan review and that plan reviews are completed at state level. Each reviewed project receives a construction design release number that the licensed and registered contractor provides when the permit is submitted.
MATERIALS
Is safety glazing the same thing as tempered glass?
No. “Safety glazing” describes compliance with an applicable impact-performance requirement; “tempered glass” names one material and treatment route that can satisfy it. The location rule and the compliant-product question are separate decisions.
Tempered glass. Tempered glass is included in the federal definition of glazing material. It can qualify where the product has passed the applicable test and carries the required identification; the code does not make “tempered” the universal name of the requirement.
Laminated glass. The federal definition describes laminated glass as two or more pieces of glass bonded to an intervening layer or layers of resilient plastic material. Laminated assemblies can qualify as safety glazing when tested and identified for the required application.
Wired glass. The federal rule retains a narrow exemption where wired glass is used in a door or other assembly to retard the passage of fire and that use is required by a federal, state, local, or municipal fire ordinance. ANSI Z97.1-2015 eliminated the former lower Class C test; outside the federal exemption's conditions, wired glass is not automatically compliant safety glazing.
Identifying a hazardous location does not select a product by itself. The applicable category or class, listing, marking, structural requirement, fire-protection requirement, and adopted edition still have to be satisfied.
VERIFICATION DATE
Why does the 2026 verification date matter?
Several reference points have moved recently enough to make undated charts unreliable. The 2024 IBC changed the outboard-pane threshold and clarified multipane and glass-guard provisions, the 2024 IRC renumbered the glazing section, and ANSI Z97.1-2026 is now available while the federal rule continues to incorporate the 2015 test edition.
The adoption gap remains equally important. Indiana still publishes a 2012 IBC base for commercial work and a 2018 IRC base for residential work, so a current model-code answer can be technically accurate and locally wrong if its edition is not identified.
LIMITATIONS
What are the limitations of this chart?
This dataset is an educational reference. It does not replace an adopted code, an incorporated amendment, a project specification, an approved construction document, a written interpretation, a product listing, a design release, or a determination by the authority having jurisdiction.
- The 2024 IBC and 2024 IRC columns describe national model-code provisions. They do not establish that those editions have been adopted in a particular jurisdiction. Local amendments are not cataloged outside the Indiana Chapter 24 and adoption records identified on this page.
- The chart covers human-impact safety glazing and selected federal architectural-glazing product classifications. It does not provide a complete treatment of fire-rated glazing, structural glass design under IBC §2407, glass thickness selection under ASTM E1300, windborne-debris glazing, blast or security glazing, skylights and sloped glazing, glass floors, existing-building provisions, historic-district approvals, or Canadian requirements.
- Federal product scope and building-code location scope are related but distinct. A product can fall outside a federal interpretation and remain subject to an adopted building-code rule; the exterior-wall bathroom window is the clearest example.
- The Indiana rows identify the editions and administrative information published as current on July 25, 2026. Later rulemaking, amendments, written interpretations, or changes to county procedures can alter the controlling answer.
- Glazing in guards, storefronts, overhead assemblies, wet areas, and stair locations presents fall, laceration, structural-load, and handling hazards. This page contains no installation, removal, cutting, drilling, lifting, or replacement instructions; those operations belong to qualified personnel working from approved documents and the requirements of the authority having jurisdiction.
RESOLVED QUESTIONS
How were the previously unresolved figures resolved?
Every consequential flag in the working draft was either verified from a primary source or removed from the published claim set. The table below records the final disposition so a future update can reproduce the decision instead of reopening the same ambiguity from memory.
Table 8. Resolution of the draft's verification questions
| Draft question | Final verified disposition | Primary source |
|---|---|---|
| Did the 2024 IRC retain the 25-foot outboard-pane exception? | Yes. R324.4.3 retains 25 feet and names adjacent exterior grade, roof, walking surface, or qualifying horizontal or sloped surface | ICC 2024 IRC R324.4.3 |
| Which IBC edition changed the bottom-landing trigger from 36 to 60 inches? | 2015 IBC. The 2012 text has 36 inches; the 2015 text has 60 inches; ICC's 2015 update identifies the revision | ICC 2012 IBC, ICC 2015 IBC, ICC 2015 IBC Update |
| Were unverified individual cells from the model-code impact tables published? | No. The page publishes the verified default rule and federal product categories, not unsourced table-cell transcriptions | ICC 2024 IBC §2406.2; ICC 2024 IRC §R324.3.1 |
| Which ANSI edition is incorporated in the federal rule? | ANSI Z97.1-2015. Current §1201.4 identifies that edition | 16 CFR §1201.4 |
| Which ANSI edition does the 2024 IRC reference? | ANSI Z97.1-2015 (R2020). | ICC 2024 IRC Chapter 44 |
| What can be stated about ANSI Z97.1-2026? | The new edition is available and succeeds the 2015 (R2020) edition; unsupported trade-press details were not carried into the page | ASC Z97 2026 foreword and official site |
| Does Indiana separately amend IBC §2406 in its Chapter 24 rule? | The adopted Chapter 24 amendment at 675 IAC 13-2.6-25 amends §2403.1 identification and points safety glazing to §2406.3; no separate hazardous-location amendment is created there | Indiana Register final rule 675 IAC 13-2.6-25 |
| Were the guard and wet-surface rows read directly? | Yes. Both rows and their code-specific exceptions were checked against official 2024 code material | ICC 2024 IBC Chapter 24; ICC 2024 IRC Chapter 3 |
No pending verification marker remains in the page, CSV, JSON, source list, FAQ, or JSON-LD.
DATASET DOWNLOAD
What is included in the dataset download?
The downloadable dataset contains the 12 normalized records used to build the visible chart. The CSV and JSON contain the same record IDs, verification date, source names, source URLs, model-code columns, Indiana-edition columns, federal-scope notes, exceptions, and methodological qualifiers.
- Dataset title
- Safety Glazing Requirements Chart: IRC, IBC, CPSC, and Indiana Crosswalk
- Version
- 2026-07-25-v1
- Records
- 12
- Last fully verified
- Fields
- record_id, record_type, scenario, core_trigger, model_code_2024_irc, model_code_2024_ibc, indiana_residential_2018_irc, indiana_commercial_2012_ibc, federal_16_cfr_1201, exceptions_or_qualifiers, verification_tier, verified_date, primary_source_names, primary_source_urls, notes
HOW TO CITE THIS PAGE
How can this page be cited?
This block is a neutral publication reference. It records the organizational author, page title, canonical URL, verification date, and dataset version.
- Organization
- Fort Wayne Commercial Glass Repair Research
- Page title
- Safety Glazing Requirements Chart: IBC and IRC Compared
- URL
- https://fortwaynecommercialglassrepair.com/research/safety-glazing-requirements-chart/
- Last fully verified
- Dataset version
- 2026-07-25-v1
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
What are the most common safety glazing questions?
These answers restate the chart's most frequently confused distinctions in compact form. They use the same editions, measurements, and exceptions as the visible tables and the downloadable dataset.
- Is safety glazing the same as tempered glass?
- No. Safety glazing is a compliance category defined by impact performance. Tempered glass is one material that can satisfy it; laminated glass and other qualified materials can also comply when tested and identified for the application.
- What is the 24-inch rule for safety glazing?
- The two codes state it differently. The 2024 IBC treats glazing as hazardous where its nearest vertical edge falls within a 24-inch arc of either vertical edge of a closed door and its bottom exposed edge is below 60 inches. The 2024 IRC uses a two-part test: within 24 inches of either side of the door in the closed-door plane, or on a wall less than 180 degrees from that plane and within 24 inches of the hinge side of an in-swinging door.
- Do all four low-window conditions have to be met?
- Yes. Pane area greater than 9 square feet, bottom edge below 18 inches, top edge above 36 inches, and a walking surface within 36 inches horizontally must all be true for the general large-window hazardous-location test.
- Does a pane measuring exactly 9 square feet meet the "greater than 9 square feet" condition?
- No. Exactly 9 square feet does not satisfy "greater than 9." The same boundary logic means exactly 18 inches does not satisfy "less than 18," and exactly 36 inches does not satisfy "greater than 36."
- Why do the IRC and IBC give different answers near stairs?
- They use different vertical triggers and different protective exceptions. The 2024 IRC uses 36 inches and a qualifying protective-rail exception; the 2024 IBC uses 60 inches and a guard-and-distance exception. Both also except glazing at least 36 inches horizontally from the walking surface.
- Why do some references say R308.4 and others say R324.4?
- The 2024 IRC renumbered the glazing provisions from R308 to R324. Both numbers are correct for different editions. Indiana's residential code is based on the 2018 IRC, so R308.4 remains the current Indiana citation.
- Does a window near a shower require safety glazing?
- It can under the adopted building code when the location and below-60-inch condition are met. Separately, the CPSC has stated since 1981 that federal Part 1201 does not apply to an exterior-wall window over a bathtub or within a shower stall. Those are different scope questions.
- What is the difference between Category I and Category II?
- Category I/Class B uses a 150 foot-pound test with a 100-pound shot bag dropped 18 to 18.5 inches. Category II/Class A uses 400 foot-pounds and a 48- to 48.5-inch drop. The federal regulation states the Category-to-Class equivalence directly.
- Is wired glass safety glazing?
- Not automatically. The federal rule retains a narrow exemption for wired glass used to retard fire where that use is required by a federal, state, local, or municipal fire ordinance. ANSI Z97.1-2015 eliminated the former lower Class C impact test, so wired glass outside the exemption must satisfy the applicable current performance requirement.
- Do glass guards need anything beyond safety glazing?
- Yes. Glazing in guards and railings is a hazardous location regardless of pane area or height, but structural adequacy is governed separately. The 2024 IBC Section 2407 provisions include material, support, load, and nominal-stress requirements in addition to the Section 2406 human-impact rule.
- Does Fort Wayne use the 2024 IBC?
- No. Indiana currently lists a commercial code based on the 2012 IBC and a residential code based on the 2018 IRC, and Allen County publishes the same editions. The 2024 columns in this chart are national model-code comparisons.
- Which rule controls when the federal standard, the model code, and the local code differ?
- The federal product standard governs products within its current scope. The adopted jurisdictional code and amendments govern the building-code requirements for the project. A model code that has not been adopted remains a reference rather than the local enforceable edition.
PRIMARY SOURCES
Which primary sources support this chart?
The source list contains the code publisher, federal regulator, standards developer, Indiana issuing agency, Indiana Register, and Allen County pages used in the verification pass. Secondary coverage and competitor pages are not sources for any published requirement or figure.
- 1. International Code Council, 2024 International Residential Code, Chapter 3: Building Planning (read July 25, 2026)
- 2. International Code Council, 2024 IRC §R324.4.3, Glazing in Windows (read July 25, 2026)
- 3. International Code Council, 2024 IRC, Chapter 44: Referenced Standards (read July 25, 2026)
- 4. Humboldt County, California, Safety Glazing / Tempered Windows, CRC R324.4 (read July 25, 2026)
- 5. International Code Council, 2024 International Building Code, Chapter 24: Glass and Glazing (read July 25, 2026)
- 6. International Code Council, 2024 IBC, Chapter 35: Referenced Standards (read July 25, 2026)
- 7. International Code Council, 2012 International Building Code, Chapter 24: Glass and Glazing (read July 25, 2026)
- 8. International Code Council, 2015 International Building Code, Chapter 24: Glass and Glazing (read July 25, 2026)
- 9. International Code Council, 2015 IBC Update (read July 25, 2026)
- 10. International Code Council, 2015 International Residential Code, Chapter 3: Building Planning (read July 25, 2026)
- 11. International Code Council, Significant Changes to the 2018 International Residential Code (read July 25, 2026)
- 12. U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 16 CFR Part 1201, Safety Standard for Architectural Glazing Materials (read July 25, 2026)
- 13. U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 16 CFR §1201.2, Definitions (read July 25, 2026)
- 14. U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 16 CFR §1201.4, Test Procedures (read July 25, 2026)
- 15. U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 16 CFR §1201.40, Interpretation Concerning Bathtub and Shower Doors and Enclosures (read July 25, 2026)
- 16. U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, Safety Standard for Architectural Glazing Materials, Final Rule (read July 25, 2026)
- 17. Indiana Department of Homeland Security, Rules of the Indiana Fire Prevention and Building Safety Commission (read July 25, 2026)
- 18. Indiana Register, Final Rule 675 IAC 13-2.6, including §25, Chapter 24: Glass and Glazing (read July 25, 2026)
- 19. Indiana Department of Homeland Security, 675 IAC 12, General Administrative Rules (read July 25, 2026)
- 20. International Code Council, 2020 Indiana Residential Code, incorporated amendments (read July 25, 2026)
- 21. Allen County, Indiana, Permits & Planning: Current Codes and Plan Review (read July 25, 2026)
- 22. Accredited Standards Committee Z97, ANSI Z97.1-2026 Foreword (read July 25, 2026)
- 23. Accredited Standards Committee Z97, ANSI Z97.1 Standard Homepage (read July 25, 2026)
Last fully verified: · Dataset version: 2026-07-25-v1 · Fort Wayne Commercial Glass Repair Research
This is a non-commercial research reference. It contains no installation instructions, no project-specific rulings, and no advice. The authority having jurisdiction controls a specific project.
RELATED PAGES
Related pages on this site
- Commercial Glass Reference Desk — sourced references covering federal glazing rules, Indiana code, Allen County permits, and local authorities
- Commercial Door Glass Repair in Fort Wayne — door leaves and qualifying glazing beside doors can be hazardous locations, subject to the adopted code's listed exceptions
- Storefront Glass Repair in Fort Wayne — storefront systems, fixed lites, and how code applies to display glass
- Editorial & Source Standards — how this site verifies facts, uses official sources, and records review dates